4,043
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Amristar photos: replies
Nice uploads. Re the license, it's a little bit unclear what you mean. Perhaps change to something like ''external use with author's permission only'' (if that is what you mean) or maybe you might like [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ this license]. [[User:Sarahb|Sarah]] 07:07, 14 October 2009 (PDT)
:License - I'll get back to you about this as I want to check exactly what our policy is supposed to be.
:Massacres - I think if it isn't considered a battle it shouldn't go in that category. The Indian Mutiny events you raise are a good point. Bibigarh and possibly Delhi are not really actions between two armed forces - they can just be in the Indian Mutiny category alone. Not sure about Trimmoo Ghaut. Although an annihilation, if there is fighting involved between recognised parts of the armed forces then perhaps it is a battle? It's fine to have articles on the Mutiny that aren't in the Battles category. So the Massacre at Ajnala article you have written doesn't need to go down as a battle too, just a part of the Indian Mutiny. I don't think we need anything additional, but if you prefer we could always just have Events during the Indian Mutiny or something nonspecific like that.
:Mutinies - yes, I noticed them and did think maybe a new category was needed. You are right they would be strange in the Mutinies category but we can put whatever category we make into Mutinies as well as Indian Mutiny. Btw, it's ok to use the battle infobox on anything you think appropriate as it doesn't specifically mention 'battle' anywhere on the box. Well, we can't call the category Indian Mutiny Mutinies...how about something like 1857 Bengal Army Mutinies? [[User:Sarahb|Sarah]] 11:38, 14 October 2009 (PDT)
