Talk:Chaplains Returns: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
reply |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Hi Sarah | Hi Sarah | ||
I took out the actual regiment and year of bith to try to protect personal details. I guess I shouldn't have put inverted commas. Regards | I took out the actual regiment and year of bith to try to protect personal details. I guess I shouldn't have put inverted commas. Regards [[User:Maureene|Maureene]] 12:52, 1 March 2010 (PST) | ||
:Oh I see. Thanks for explaining. As I couldn't quite follow that I think I will make a slight amendment (which will mean it is fine to be in quotes). By the way, I wonder if when you add info someone has emailed to you it might be an idea to add a footnote saying something like 'By email to User:Maureene, 26th Feb 2010' - just so there is no confusion over the phrase 'a researcher has advised' in the future. Obviously no details at all need be given. [[User:Sarahb|Sarah]] 15:26, 1 March 2010 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:26, 1 March 2010
Maureen, is this book title correct?
- “Army Book 112 (Register of Births) of the bth Bn. ath Punjab Regiment for the six months ending 30th June 19xy reported from the Military Station at Isak (North Waziristan)”
Sarah 06:50, 1 March 2010 (PST)
Hi Sarah I took out the actual regiment and year of bith to try to protect personal details. I guess I shouldn't have put inverted commas. Regards Maureene 12:52, 1 March 2010 (PST)
- Oh I see. Thanks for explaining. As I couldn't quite follow that I think I will make a slight amendment (which will mean it is fine to be in quotes). By the way, I wonder if when you add info someone has emailed to you it might be an idea to add a footnote saying something like 'By email to User:Maureene, 26th Feb 2010' - just so there is no confusion over the phrase 'a researcher has advised' in the future. Obviously no details at all need be given. Sarah 15:26, 1 March 2010 (PST)