4,043
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
copyright etc
==Indian Army==
Yes, that was a good idea to put (British), as 'from 1895' didn't then rule out the post-Indp army. I saw that wikipedia page too, it is helpful (and I might copy their table). As I didn't know that much about the Indian Army I used it to decide that things should only be categorised as Indian Army after 1895 and before that still as the Company Armies. As it said that before 1895 Indian Army was only an unofficial term I have decided to stick to that rule. If someone who knows much more about the Indian Army than us thinks it should be otherwise, then we can change it again. [[User:Sarahb|Sarahb]] 01:51, 25 March 2009 (PDT)
:Its getting there! [[User:Sarahb|Sarahb]] 05:43, 25 March 2009 (PDT)
==Skinner's Horse==
I saw you put in that biographical information from the roots list. Do you know if it is a direct quote from the Dictionary of Indian Biography? If so, and that is not an out of copyright book, we cannot use it on the page. A rewrite in your own words (and then a reference) would probably be fine. [[User:Sarahb|Sarahb]] 01:51, 25 March 2009 (PDT)
:'''Re:copyright''' As I understand the situation, anything on the site must adhere to UK/EU copyright law, regardless of who has added the information and where they are located. In cases where one is unsure, err on the side of caution so as not to cause problems for Fibis. In this case I don't think we can use the text, but it is perfectly acceptable to write a piece based on the text (and probably helpful just to acknowledge that in a references section). It's a nice background piece for Skinner's Horse so a rewrite and reference is probably the answer. [[User:Sarahb|Sarahb]] 05:43, 25 March 2009 (PDT)
