4,043
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Bengal regiments again: reply
On the other matter, I think it might be less confusing all round if we make a new page for those regiments such as the original 19th. That has the added bonus of there being a page for the table to link to. The new table will be able to field people in the right directions so I don't think we need to worry about making a note on the actual 19th Reg page. We will link the table from all the pages. I suggest calling the page the [[19th Battalion of Bengal Native Infantry]] rather than a name such as [[19th Regiment of Bengal Native Infantry (1764)]]. What do you think? [[User:Sarahb|Sarah]] 06:44, 19 January 2010 (PST)
:I actually quite liked the 'boxed panel' but I think it gave undue prominence to the former regiment's chronology, therefore confusing the real focus of the page. Re the page as it looks with all 74 regts - crikey, it'll probably be a bit overwhelming at first glance, but I actually think it makes perfect sense. [[User:Sarahb|Sarah]] 11:35, 19 January 2010 (PST)
