Adyar River Tramway: Difference between revisions

From FIBIwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
PEA-2292 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
PEA-2292 (talk | contribs)
'Tramroads, Riverbed Crossings' and 'Further Information' and 'Category' added
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Adyar River Tramway''' was under consideration in 1842 to provide a stone tramway to connect south [[Madras]] to the outlying districts of Santhome and Mylapore.  
The '''Adyar River Tramway''' was under consideration in 1842 to provide a tramway, either using stone or iron rails, to connect south [[Madras]] to the outlying districts of Santhome and Mylapore.  
<ref> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adyar_River Wikipedia  “Adyar River ” ] Retrieved on  14 Aug 2016</ref>
<ref> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adyar_River Wikipedia  “Adyar River ” ] Retrieved on  14 Aug 2016</ref>


A bridge carrying over the Adyar River named the  '''[[Elphinstone Bridge]]''' had been constructed about 1840 during the time of Lord Elphinstone, who was governor of Madras from 1837 to 1842.
The proposal was to construct a tramway, presumably to convey carts pulled by bullock and extended over existing roads. A short length was constucted but in 1843 the experiment was abandoned.   
 
The proposal was to construct a stone tramway on the existing bridge, presumably to convey carts pulled by bullock and extended over existing roads. A short length was constucted but in 1843 the experiment was abandoned.   


==History==
==History==
By 1842 a letter to the Court of Directors of the [[East India Company]] requested payment of R1817.15 for the construction of the tramway <ref>British Library IOR/Z/E/4/A/198 “Letter dated  23rd November 1842”</ref>.
By 1842 a letter to the Court of Directors of the [[East India Company]] requested payment of Rs1817.15 for the construction of the tramway <ref>British Library IOR/Z/E/4/A/198 “Letter dated  23rd November 1842”</ref>.


In the reply the Directors requested a report from the Military Board on the feasibility of the experiment <ref>British Library IOR/F/4/2089 “Military Report 135 1843 Board collections 97150” </ref>. In the engineer’s report Lieutenant Robertson says the engineer escorted the Superintendent of Roads to review the tramway. A length of stone tramway 684ft (0.12Km) had been built “substantially with judgement. The track had been down 2 monsoons so was a fair trial. It was useful with the public facilitating the haulage across what was in some parts a heavy bed of sand".  The cost quoted differed at R1539 for the length of stone track. This meant a calculated R11,88.00 per mile (1.06Km). There was evidence that the sets had moved and over a longer route would be costly to maintain. A suggestion that causeways would be cheaper and more easily maintained <ref>British Library IOR/F/4/2089 “Military Report 135 1843 Board collections 97150”</ref>. These facts unfortunately put an end to the experiment and the Directors declined to continue <ref>British Library IOR/E/4/963/P905 “Letter from the Revenue Department dated 9th September 1863” </ref>.  
In the reply the Directors requested a report from the Military Board on the feasibility of the experiment <ref>British Library IOR/F/4/2089 “Military Report 135 1843 Board collections 97150” </ref>. In the engineer’s report Lieutenant Robertson says the engineer escorted the Superintendent of Roads to review the tramway. A length of stone tramway 684ft (0.12Km) had been built “substantially with judgement. The track had been down 2 monsoons so was a fair trial. It was useful with the public facilitating the haulage across what was in some parts a heavy bed of sand".  The cost quoted differed at Rs1539 for the length of track. This meant a calculated Rs11,880 per mile (1.6Km). There was evidence that the sets had moved and over a longer route would be costly to maintain. A suggestion that causeways would be cheaper and more easily maintained <ref>British Library IOR/F/4/2089 “Military Report 135 1843 Board collections 97150”</ref>. These facts unfortunately put an end to the experiment and the Directors declined to continue <ref>British Library IOR/E/4/963/P905 “Letter from the Revenue Department dated 9th September 1863” </ref>.  


==Records==
==Records==
Line 18: Line 16:


==Further Information==
==Further Information==
See '''[[Elphinstone Bridge]]'''
For more information and background:-
 
See '''[[Early Railway Experiments and Proposals]]'''
 
and '''[[Tramroads, Riverbed Crossings]]'''


==References==
==References==
Line 24: Line 26:


[[Category:Railways]]
[[Category:Railways]]
[[Category:Railway Constructions‎]]
[[Category:Tramways]]
[[Category:Tramways]]
[[Category:Early Railway Experiments and Proposals ]]
[[Category:Early Railway Experiments and Proposals]]
[[Category: Tramroads, Riverbed Crossings]]

Latest revision as of 07:00, 15 February 2017

The Adyar River Tramway was under consideration in 1842 to provide a tramway, either using stone or iron rails, to connect south Madras to the outlying districts of Santhome and Mylapore. [1]

The proposal was to construct a tramway, presumably to convey carts pulled by bullock and extended over existing roads. A short length was constucted but in 1843 the experiment was abandoned.

History

By 1842 a letter to the Court of Directors of the East India Company requested payment of Rs1817.15 for the construction of the tramway [2].

In the reply the Directors requested a report from the Military Board on the feasibility of the experiment [3]. In the engineer’s report Lieutenant Robertson says the engineer escorted the Superintendent of Roads to review the tramway. A length of stone tramway 684ft (0.12Km) had been built “substantially with judgement. The track had been down 2 monsoons so was a fair trial. It was useful with the public facilitating the haulage across what was in some parts a heavy bed of sand". The cost quoted differed at Rs1539 for the length of track. This meant a calculated Rs11,880 per mile (1.6Km). There was evidence that the sets had moved and over a longer route would be costly to maintain. A suggestion that causeways would be cheaper and more easily maintained [4]. These facts unfortunately put an end to the experiment and the Directors declined to continue [5].

Records

The India Office Records (IOR) records held at the British Library relating to this tramway are primary information sources: -

  • Z/E/4/46/A198; 1842-1845; Adyar River, Tramway across, construction
  • Z/E/4/46/M386; 1842-1845; Madras Town, Tramway across Adyar River, construction
  • Z/E/4/46/T283 and Z/E/4/46/R430; 1842-1845; Tramways, across Adyar River , satisfactory construction.

Further Information

For more information and background:-

See Early Railway Experiments and Proposals

and Tramroads, Riverbed Crossings

References

  1. Wikipedia “Adyar River ” Retrieved on 14 Aug 2016
  2. British Library IOR/Z/E/4/A/198 “Letter dated 23rd November 1842”
  3. British Library IOR/F/4/2089 “Military Report 135 1843 Board collections 97150”
  4. British Library IOR/F/4/2089 “Military Report 135 1843 Board collections 97150”
  5. British Library IOR/E/4/963/P905 “Letter from the Revenue Department dated 9th September 1863”