Difference between revisions of "Great Western of India Railway Survey"

From FIBIwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Data added, links checked, Work-in-progress removed)
(References format corrected)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The '''Great Western of India Railway Survey''' was under survey in 1889 by Horace Bell as Engineer in Chief. This is as recorded in 1890 and 1903.
 
The '''Great Western of India Railway Survey''' was under survey in 1889 by Horace Bell as Engineer in Chief. This is as recorded in 1890 and 1903.
 +
<ref>India Civil List 1890 PWD Railways</ref>
 +
<ref>[http://www.forgottenbooks.com/readbook_text/Minutes_of_Proceedings_1903_1000771908/329 p.320-1. Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil – Horace Bell]; Retrieved 11 Dec 2015</ref>
  
 
The 1906 record  only makes references to several Bengal and North-Western Railway projects. It is therefore concluded that this project did not proceed.
 
The 1906 record  only makes references to several Bengal and North-Western Railway projects. It is therefore concluded that this project did not proceed.
 +
<ref>[https://archive.org/details/RailwayProjects  History of Railway Projects, including Tramways – corrected up to 30th June 1906]; Retrieved 11 Dec 2015</ref>
  
==External Links==
+
== References ==
*[http://www.forgottenbooks.com/readbook_text/Minutes_of_Proceedings_1903_1000771908/329 p.320-1. Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil – Horace Bell]
+
<references />
*[https://archive.org/details/RailwayProjects  History of Railway Projects, including Tramways – corrected up to 30th June 1906]
 
 
 
==References==
 
India Civil List 1890 PWD Railways
 
 
 
  
 
[[Category:Railway Surveys]]
 
[[Category:Railway Surveys]]
 
[[Category:Railways]]
 
[[Category:Railways]]

Revision as of 09:41, 11 December 2015

The Great Western of India Railway Survey was under survey in 1889 by Horace Bell as Engineer in Chief. This is as recorded in 1890 and 1903. [1] [2]

The 1906 record only makes references to several Bengal and North-Western Railway projects. It is therefore concluded that this project did not proceed. [3]

References