Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Apothecary

7 bytes removed, 16:37, 28 January 2014
m
Crawford’s Roll of the Indian Medical Service: link
====Crawford’s Roll of the Indian Medical Service====
A further frequently asked question is why an Assistant Surgeon ancestor does not appear in ''Crawford’s Roll of the Indian Medical Service 1614-1930''. Apothecaries as members of the [[Indian Subordinate Medical Department]], rather than the superior [[Doctor|Indian Medical Service]], generally are not listed in Crawford, except for some entries relating to the [[Madras Presidency]] in the very early years, probably prior to the establishment of the Subordinate Medical Department. It should be noted that IMS used the title Assistant Surgeon for its lower ranks until 1873 and that the ISMD used the same title after 1894. Therefore if your Assistant Surgeon appears with that title before 1873, he should be in the IMS and will not be an Apothecary.
Medical personnel appointed to the IMS will almost always have been educated in the UK, even if they were born in India. They always held higher medical ranking. [http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/21858/pages/976 This London Gazette article] set out the requirements for Assistant-Surgeons in the service of the [[East India Company]] in March 1856.

Navigation menu