Masulipatam and Hyderabad Light Railway: Difference between revisions
New page all checked |
Complete re-write with BL research by Steve Moore |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The ''' Masulipatam and Hyderabad Light Railway''' | The ''' Masulipatam and Hyderabad Tramway/Light Railway proposal''' | ||
There was a proposal in 1854-55 to provide a tramway or light railway between [[Masulipatam]] and [[Hyderabad]]. This would have been a route that would follow the current road number NH65. This is a distance of 115 miles (185km). | |||
It was under consideration at the same time as the [[Cuddalore and Salem Tramway/Light Railway proposal]], which was not sanctioned. | |||
[[Masulipatam]], (named Machilipatnam today) was founded in the 14th century and it was a major trading port for the British, Dutch and French from the seventeenth century <ref name=machil>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machilipatnam Wikipedia “Machilipatnam” ]; Retrieved 24 Aug 2016</ref>. The port was damaged by a giant ocean wave on 1 November 1864 <ref>[http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/the-rise-and-fall-of-maesolia-port/article7514192.ece The Hindu “The rise and fall of Maesolia Port” 8 Aug 2015]; Retrieved 24 Aug 2016</ref>. | |||
==Background== | |||
Colonel [[Arthur Thomas Cotton]] of the [[Madras Engineers]] through the [[Government]] of [[Madras Presidency]] at [[Fort St George]] proposed that a railroad calculated for low speed should be substituted for roads of ordinary construction. <ref> IOR/E/4/825 P720 Public Works, Engineers, Madras, Suggestion of Chief for construction of light railway on roads between Cuddalore and Salem and Masulipatam and Hyderabad</ref>. The road had been built 25yrs before (1829) and had been left in a serious state of disrepair and required almost complete reconstruction. <ref> IOR/E/4/825 P716 </ref> The Directors of the [[East India Company]] apologised for this <ref> IOR/E/4/825 P727</ref>. | |||
[[Masulipatam]] was first settled in the 3rd cent BC (BCE) and the British India company built its first factory (producing and dyeing various cloths), there which meant it grew in to a major trading port<ref name=machil/>. Master in his diary of 1677 describes the port and roads thus “the towne was so well stored with able merchants that many ships loads were procured in a space of one or two days” <ref> “The diaries of Streynsham Master 1675—1680” and other contemporary papers relating there to; edited by Sir Richard Carnac Temple, Bart., Cle. Vol. L The Diary, 1675-1677, published for the Government of India London John Murray, Albemarle Street 1911 p 615</ref>. The lines of communication were very important to sustain the operations and the formation of the road to Hydrabad was of Political and Military importance. The length of road within the Presidency was 115miles (185 km) <ref> IOR/E/4/825 P716</ref> | |||
Due to the importance of communication between Masulipatam and the hinterland a canal linking the town and the River Krishna had been built. The Buckingham canal would also terminate at the same point in Vijayawada along with a canal linking with the Godavari River. The Directors were however of the opinion that a railroad on the Hydrabad Road would be of an advantage. <ref> IOR/E/4/825 P724</ref> Much force was given to the comments of Mr Daniel Elliot and Mr Thomas on the advantages and the problems changing modes of transport on the way to the port <ref> IOR/E/4/825 P725</ref>. They requested that a low speed railway be constructed at a moderate cost, should be tested in such localities that may be most favourable <ref> IOR/E/4/825 P725 </ref>. The traction to be either light engine or animal power <ref>IOR/E/4/825 P726/7</ref>. The Madras Government were to select the District and supply the money. | |||
Where the experiments were carried out and the result of them is unclear, but the result was that Tramway/Light Railway was not built. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 04:50, 25 August 2016
The Masulipatam and Hyderabad Tramway/Light Railway proposal There was a proposal in 1854-55 to provide a tramway or light railway between Masulipatam and Hyderabad. This would have been a route that would follow the current road number NH65. This is a distance of 115 miles (185km).
It was under consideration at the same time as the Cuddalore and Salem Tramway/Light Railway proposal, which was not sanctioned.
Masulipatam, (named Machilipatnam today) was founded in the 14th century and it was a major trading port for the British, Dutch and French from the seventeenth century [1]. The port was damaged by a giant ocean wave on 1 November 1864 [2].
Background
Colonel Arthur Thomas Cotton of the Madras Engineers through the Government of Madras Presidency at Fort St George proposed that a railroad calculated for low speed should be substituted for roads of ordinary construction. [3]. The road had been built 25yrs before (1829) and had been left in a serious state of disrepair and required almost complete reconstruction. [4] The Directors of the East India Company apologised for this [5].
Masulipatam was first settled in the 3rd cent BC (BCE) and the British India company built its first factory (producing and dyeing various cloths), there which meant it grew in to a major trading port[1]. Master in his diary of 1677 describes the port and roads thus “the towne was so well stored with able merchants that many ships loads were procured in a space of one or two days” [6]. The lines of communication were very important to sustain the operations and the formation of the road to Hydrabad was of Political and Military importance. The length of road within the Presidency was 115miles (185 km) [7]
Due to the importance of communication between Masulipatam and the hinterland a canal linking the town and the River Krishna had been built. The Buckingham canal would also terminate at the same point in Vijayawada along with a canal linking with the Godavari River. The Directors were however of the opinion that a railroad on the Hydrabad Road would be of an advantage. [8] Much force was given to the comments of Mr Daniel Elliot and Mr Thomas on the advantages and the problems changing modes of transport on the way to the port [9]. They requested that a low speed railway be constructed at a moderate cost, should be tested in such localities that may be most favourable [10]. The traction to be either light engine or animal power [11]. The Madras Government were to select the District and supply the money.
Where the experiments were carried out and the result of them is unclear, but the result was that Tramway/Light Railway was not built.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Wikipedia “Machilipatnam” ; Retrieved 24 Aug 2016
- ↑ The Hindu “The rise and fall of Maesolia Port” 8 Aug 2015; Retrieved 24 Aug 2016
- ↑ IOR/E/4/825 P720 Public Works, Engineers, Madras, Suggestion of Chief for construction of light railway on roads between Cuddalore and Salem and Masulipatam and Hyderabad
- ↑ IOR/E/4/825 P716
- ↑ IOR/E/4/825 P727
- ↑ “The diaries of Streynsham Master 1675—1680” and other contemporary papers relating there to; edited by Sir Richard Carnac Temple, Bart., Cle. Vol. L The Diary, 1675-1677, published for the Government of India London John Murray, Albemarle Street 1911 p 615
- ↑ IOR/E/4/825 P716
- ↑ IOR/E/4/825 P724
- ↑ IOR/E/4/825 P725
- ↑ IOR/E/4/825 P725
- ↑ IOR/E/4/825 P726/7